The Research Mentorship Program was officially launched in July, 2012 and is part of the 3rd Integrated Plan of Increasing Research Intensiveness. It supports new faculty to become more successful in reaching their research goals and potential via informative and interactive workshops on topics of choice, together with a personalized research mentorship team (PRMT) that consists of local and global research experts in the mentee’s research area of interest. The PRMT for each new faculty hire helps in their understanding the Departmental, College, and University research culture and expectations, assists with the development of their research vision/plan and its subsequent implementation and sustainability. The importance of forming research networks is emphasized for the mentee as a few expert research mentors, in the candidate’s area of research interest, either local or global, are sought to be part of the mentee’s mentorship team. Instructional experts can be easily added to the team to assist with the instructional scholarship questions of the candidate.
The Research Mentorship Program also provides annual workshops for any more established faculty that wish to learn more about best practices in becoming a research mentor for less established mentee.
The University Research Mentorship Program is a voluntary, yet highly encouraged program for any new faculty member in any discipline of study, or for any more established faculty member that needs mentorship assistance with their current research program. This Research mentorship program is a shared program between the central offices of the Provost and Vice President Research (for managing mentorship workshops and forums for new and established faculty) and the specific Colleges, Schools and Departments across campus, where the personalized research mentorship teams for each faculty member are formed and operationalized with the help of respective Deans, ADRs, Department Heads and research facilitators). This “umbrella” program is to augment and bring to the attention the many instructional and research support programs on campus for faculty.
Effective mentorship programs for new faculty have been shown globally to enhance their academic career success. This program can and will assist faculty in reaching tenure and promotion, and in so doing helps candidates in promoting best practices of mentorship unto their students and fellow faculty members.
The University of Saskatchewan wants to promote the vision statement to enhance the research success and productivity of new faculty by providing, as one step, the establishment of a Research Mentorship Program for all new tenure track faculty hired in July, 2012 and beyond. This program will be a collaborative undertaking between Colleges, Schools, Departments or Research Units and the Offices of the Vice-President Research and the Office of the Vice-Provost.
Why Mentoring for New and Pre-Tenure Faculty? Academic Success!
October 8, 2015
By Prof. Jim Thornhill, Special Assistant to the Vice-President Research
Mentorship of pre-tenure faculty is a key component to academic success. Sutherland and Peterson (2009) advocate from a national study conducted throughout New Zealand that early academic success of new faculty is determined by 3 factors:
- Prior training and experience of the new candidate,
- Personal characteristics of the candidate (tenacity, resolve, work/life balance) and
- The institutional support provided (e.g. time, space, resources).
At the University of Saskatchewan, The Provost’s Office via the Gwenna Moss Teaching & Learning Centre and the Vice President Research Office via the Research Mentorship Program have come together to highlight and support mentorship in assisting new faculty in planning and implementing their teaching and research plans.
This video introduces how academic mentorship teams support new faculty at the University of Saskatchewan with their two major mandates, namely their teaching and research portfolios as experienced by two pre-tenure faculty in The College of Kinesiology. Dr. Leah Ferguson and Dr. Marta Erlandson, along with Dean Carol Rodgers, discuss what academic success looks like, how their mentorship committees were formed, the benefits to working with mentorship committees, suggestions based on their experiences, the importance of a diverse committee, practical considerations for a positive mentorship experience, and how mentorship can contribute to academic success.
If you have questions about mentorship activities at the University of Saskatchewan, please contact: Dr. Jim Thornhill, Co-Lead of University Mentorship Program at email@example.com.
This article was originally posted to the blog of the Gwenna Moss Centre for Teaching Effectiveness (GMCTE) at the University of Saskatchewan.
Abedin, Z., Biskup, E., Silet, K., Garbutt, J. M., Kroenke, K., Feldman, M. D., . . . Pincus, H. A. (2012). Deriving competencies for mentors of clinical and translational scholars. Cts-Clinical and Translational Science, 5(3), 273-280. doi:10.llll/j.1752-8062.2011.00366.x
Abramovitz, L., & Baggott, C. (2010). A novel nurse research mentorship program to promote evidence based practice. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 55(5), 802-802.
Barrett, R. (2010). Strategies for promoting the scientific integrity of nursing research in clinical settings. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development: JNSD: Official Journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization, 26(5), 200-5; quiz 260-7. doi:10.1097/NND.Ob013e31819b55dd
Boyer, Ernest (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching
Boyer, E. R., Moser, D., ream, T. C. & Braxton, J. M. (2015) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, John Wiley & Sons
Duggleby, W., & Haas, K. (2010). Research mentorship from the mentor's perspective. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal = Revue Canadienne De Nursing Oncologique, 20(2), 60-61.
Farley, H., Casaletto, J., Ankel, F., Young, K. D., & Hockberger, R. (2008). An assessment of the faculty development needs of junior clinical faculty in emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15 (7), 664-668. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00152.x
Feldman, M.D., Huang, L., Guglielmo, B.J., Jordon, R., Kahn, J., Creasman, J.M., Weiner-Kronish ,J.P., Lee, K.A., Tehrani, A., Yaffe, K. & Brown, J.S. (2016). Training the Next generation of Research Mentors: The University of California, San Francisco, Clinical & Translational Science Institute Mentor Development Program, Clinical translational Science 2(3): 216-221
Florczak, K. L. (2010). Moving onward: The nuts and bolts of becoming a nurse scientist. Nursing Science Quarterly, 23(4), 280-280. doi:10.1177/0894318410380270
Haase, K., & Duggleby, W. (2010). Research hot topic: Research mentorship part one. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal- Revue Canadienne De Nursing Oncologique, 20(1), 2-4.
Keyser, D. J., Lakoski, J. M., Lara-Cinisomo, S., Schultz, D. J., Williams, V. L., Zellers, D. F., & Pincus, H. A. (2008). Advancing institutional efforts to support research mentorship: A conceptual framework and self-assessment tool. Academic Medicine, 83(3), 217-225.
Kjeldsen, K., Bech, J., & Schmidt, T. A. (2004). Mentorship in medical research. Heartdrug, 4(4), 168-174. doi:10.1159/000082186
Kram, K. & Ragins, B.R. (2007). The landscape of mentoring in the 21st century. In: Ragins, B. R. & Kram, K.E. (Eds) The Handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp.659-692). Thousand Oaks ,CA, Sage Publications
Krause-Parello, C. A., Sarcone, A., Samms, K., & Boyd, Z. N. (2013). Developing a center for nursing research: An influence on nursing education and research through mentorship. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(2),106-12. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2012.08.004
Leung, D., Widger, K., Howell, D., Nelson, S., & Molassiotis, A. (2012). Mentoring advanced practice nurses in research: Recommendations from a pilot program. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal= Revue Canadienne De Nursing Oncologique, 22( 1), 31-41.
Marquez, I. C., Andrews, C., Matthews, D. C., & Clovis, J. B. (2007). From clinician to researcher - A first hand account. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 73(3), 247-251.
Ngassa, F. N. (2013). Mentoring undergraduate research: Opportunities and challenges. Developing and Maintaining a Successful Undergraduate Research Program, 1156, 39-50.
Olson, K. (2007). Research mentorship--who needs it? Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal= Revue Canadienne De Nursing Oncologique, 17(1), 37-38.
Ploeg, J., De Witt, L., Hutchison, B., Hayward, L., & Grayson, K. (2008). Evaluation of a research mentorship program in community care. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(1), 22-33. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.10.002
Ragins , B. R. & Kram, K. E. (2007). The roots and meaning of mentoring. In: Ragins, B.R. & Kram, K. E. (Eds) The Handbook of Mentoring at Work: Theory, research and practice (pp3-15). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications
Ragsdale, J. R., Vaughn, L. M., & Klein, M. (2014). Characterizing the adequacy, effectiveness, and barriers related to research mentorship among junior pediatric hospitalists and general pediatricians at a large academic institution. Hospital Pediatrics, 4(2), 93-98.
Steiner, J. F. (2014). Promoting mentorship in translational research: Should we hope for athena or train mentor? Academic Medicine, 89(5), 702-704.
Steiner, J. F., Curtis, P., Lanphear, B. P., Vu, K. 0., & Main, D.S. (2004). Assessing the role of influential mentors in the research development of primary care fellows. Academic Medicine, 79(9), 865-872.
Tsen, L. C., Borus, J. F., Nadelson, C. C., Seely, E.W., Haas, A., & Fuhlbrigge, A. L (2012). The development, implementation, and assessment of an innovative faculty mentoring leadership program. Academic Medicine, 87(12), 1757-1761. doi: 10.1097/ACM.Ob013e3182712cff
Wosnitza, M., Helker, K & Lohbeck, L. (2014). Teaching goals of early career teachers in Germany International Journal of Educational research 65: 90-103